Transition design and territorial intelligence. Approaches for the regeneration of the agency in the Anthropocene era.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31908/22159444.3673Keywords:
socioecological transition, human agency, knowledge and actionAbstract
This text addresses one of the major emergencies of the Anthropocene: the need for regeneration of human agency, through better integration between knowledge and action, in order to address crucial socio-ecological challenges. Two fields of action- research, territorial intelligence and transitions design, which share their focus on this kind of integration with different but complementary approaches are briefly presented. Synergies that can be established between them regarding revitalization of the agency are discussed. The conclusion is that there is great spot for cooperation in this regard since both fields share mindsets and objectives and the methods and tools of each field are complementary and mutually reinforcing.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2), 122.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., ... y Mersey, B. (2011). Has the Earth/’s sixth mass extinction already arrived?Nature, 471(7336), 51-57.
Bason, C., Schneider, A. 2014. Public Design in Global Perspective: Empirical Trends. En: Bason, Christian ed., Cooper, Rachel, series ed., Design for Policy. Farnham (UK): Gower Publishing Limited, 23-39.
Bastidas, A. y Martínez, H. R. (2016). Diseño social: tendencias, enfoques y campos de acción, Colombia. Arquetipo, 13(2), 89 - 113.
Bohm, D. (2004). On creativity. Londres: Routledge Classics.
Bozzano, H., et al, (2012). Inteligencia Territorial. Teoría, Métodos e Iniciativas en Europa y América Latina. La Plata, Argentina: Edulp.
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8,5 21.
Capra, F.(1997). The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. Nueva York: Anchor Books.
Carpintero, O. y Riechmann, J. (2013). Pensar la transición: enseñanzas y estrategias económico-ecológicas. Economía Crítica, 16(2), 45-107.
Chomsky, N., Foucault, M. y Elders, F. (2006). La naturaleza humana: justicia versus poder. Un debate. Buenos Aires: Katz.
Crutzen, P. J. (2006). The Anthropocene. En: E. Ehlers y T. Krafft (eds), Earth System Science in the Anthropocene. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Fischer-Kowalski, M. y Haberl, H. (eds.) (2007). Socioecological Transitions and Global Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Florin, P. y Wandersman, A. (1988). Cognitive social learning and participation in community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 689-708.
Fumagalli, A. (2007). Bioeconomía y capitalismo cognitivo Hacia un nuevo paradigma de acumulación, Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.
García Alsina, M. y Ortoll Espinet, E. (2012). Inteligencia competitiva: corpus teórico y prácticas. Ibersid, 6, 77-88.
Gardiner, M. E. (2000). Critiques of Everyday Life. Londres: Routledge.
Girardot, J-J. (2009): Territorial intelligence, RES, Ricerca E Sviluppo Per Le Politiche Social, 1, 85-95.
Girardot, J. J. (2010). Inteligencia territorial y transición socio-ecológica. Trabajo: Revista andaluza de relaciones laborales, 23, 15-39.
Girardot, J. J. y Masselot, C. (2012). El método Catalyse. En: H. Bozzano et al.,Inteligencia Territorial. Teoría, Métodos e Iniciativas en Europa y América Latina. La Plata, Argentina: Edulp.
González, S. (2014). Inteligencia Territorial y la Observación Colectiva. Revista Espacialidades, UAMM, México, 4(2), 89-109.
Han, B-C (2012). La sociedad del cansancio. Barcelona: Herder.
Han, B-C (2013). La sociedad de la transparencia. Barcelona: Herder.
Hobsbawn, E. (1994). The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914-1991, Londres: Michael Joseph and Pelham Books.
Hopkins, R. (2008). The Transition Handbook: From Oil Dependency to Local Resilience, Cambridge: UIT Cambridge.
Illich, I. (1987). Toward a History of Needs. Berkeley (CA): Heyday Books.
Irwin, T. (2015) Transition Design: A Proposal for a New Area of Design Practice, Study, and Research. Design and Culture, 7(2), 229-246. DOI: 10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829
Irwin, T., Kossof, G. y Tonkinwise, C. (2015). Transition Design: An Educational Framework for Advancing the Study and Design of Sustainable Transitions. 6th International Sustainability Transitions Conference, University of Sussex, UK, August. Disponible en https://www.academia.edu/15283122/Transition_Design_An_Educational_Framework_for_Advancing_the_Study_and_Design_of_Sustainable_Transition
Kahane, A. (2017). Collaborating with the enemy. Oakland: Brrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Kamenetsky, M. (1992). Human Needs and Aspirations. En: P. Ekins, M. A.vMax-Neef (eds.), Real-Life Economics: Understanding Wealth Creation. Londres: Routledge.
Kocaballi, B., Gemeinboeck.P., Saunders, R., Loke, L & Dong, A. (2012). Embracing relational agency in design process. Design and semantics of form and mouvement, DESFORM, 2012, 99-110.
Latour, B. (2014). Anthropology at the time of the anthropocene: a personal view of what is to be studied. Disponible en http://www.bruno latour.fr/sites/default/files/139 -AAA-Washington.pdf.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). Critique of Everyday Life. Londres: Verso.
Lockton, D. (2016). Designing Agency in the City. En: Varios autores, Embracing relational agency in design process. Ciudad de México: Buró Oficina de proyectos culturales, S.C. Disponible en http://legiblepolicy.info/book/Legible-Policies_BB.pdf.
Magnaghi, A. (2014). La biorégion urbaine. Petit traité sur le territorie bien commun, París: Eterotopia France/Rhizome,
Manzini, E. (2009). A Cosmopolitan Localism: Prospects for a Sustainable Local Development and the Possible Role of Design. En: H. Clark & D. Brody (eds.), Design Studies: A Reader. NewYork (NY): Berg.
Manzini, E. (2015). Design When Everybody Designs. London (UK): The MIT Press.
Max-Neef, M. A. (1992). Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections. New York (NY): Apex. Disponible en http://www.areanet.
Miedes, B. y Fernández, M. A., (2010). Inteligencia Territorial para la lucha contra la pobreza. Aprendizajes de 20 años sobre el terreno. Trabajo: Revista andaluza de relaciones laborales, 23, 41-73.
Miedes, B. (2009): Territorial Intelligence: Towards a new alliance between sciences and society in favour of sustainable development, RES Ricerca E Sviluppo Per Le Politiche Social, 1, 105-116
Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306(5702), 1686-1686. Disponible en org/fileadmin/user_upload/papers/Maxneef_Human_Scale_development pdf.
Prigogine, I. y Stengers, I. (1990). La nueva alianza. Metamorfosis de la ciencia. Madrid: Alianza.
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., ... & Nykvist, B. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472-475.
Rodríguez Valls, F. (2014). El intelecto humano en Spinoza. THÉMATA. Revista de Filosofía, 50(2), 135-150. doi: 10.12795/themata.2014.i50.06
Sachs, W. (1999) Planet Dialectics: Exploration in Environment and Development. Londres: Zed Books Ltd.
Santos, B. (2010). Descolonizar el Saber, Reinventar el poder . Montevideo: Ediciones Trilce.
Scharmer O. & Kaufer, K. (2013). Leading from the emerging future. From Ego-Systems to Eco System Economies. Oakland: Brrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Shove, E. (2007). The Design of Everyday Life. London (UK): Berg
Wandersman, A. & Florin, P. (2000). Citizen participation and community organizations. En: J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 247-272). New York, NY: Kluwer.
Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Smith, A., Barry, T. L., Coe, A. L., Bown, P. R., ... Stone, P. (2008). Are we now living in the Anthropocene? GSA Today, 18(2), 4-8. doi: 10.1130/GSAT01802A.1
Zimmerman, M. & Rappaport, J. (1998). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 725-750.
